Prof. John Mearsheimer: Trump met Xi, Trump Backed Down — Tariffs Failed!

von kennerderlage

 

 

Wahre Worte! "It's depressing as an American to think about the low quality of our leadership" — da kann man Mearsheimer nur zustimmen! Und ein altes Sprichwort kommt einem in den Sinn: "Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall!"

 

 

Zusammenfassung unter dem Video:

 

Trump called the recent meeting “great” and “friendly,” but John Mearsheimer argues the Chinese side came out ahead. The dispute began with U.S. tariffs imposed last April; China responded by threatening rare-earth exports and cutting soybean purchases — powerful leverage that forced the U.S. to back down. 

 

China agreed to a one-year freeze/reprieve on rare-earth restrictions and to resume some soybean purchases, but the speaker warns this is temporary and China will renegotiate after a year. The U.S. lacks near-term self-sufficiency in rare-earth mining and processing (speaker estimates ~10 years), so the one-year window leaves the U.S. vulnerable. The speaker criticizes U.S. leadership (both parties) as strategically weak compared with China and Russia, calling Chinese leaders “first-class strategists.” 

 

On tariffs: some reductions were made (examples: Japan & South Korea down to 15%), but U.S.–China tariffs remain high (figures discussed around 47% vs prior ~55–57%); the speaker is unsure what the net economic effects will be. 

 

On fentanyl: the administration links tariff reductions to Chinese action on fentanyl precursors, but the speaker is uncertain whether China’s steps are meaningful or largely for show. Broader moral/strategic critique: the speaker condemns U.S. policy in the Middle East (mentions Gaza) and Iran/Ukraine handling, calling it both morally and strategically poor. 

 

Venezuela/use of force: the speaker objects to public talk of regime change, assassination, or capture of Maduro and criticizes reports of U.S. forces sinking boats and killing people without proper interdiction/boarding — calling such actions legally and morally dubious. 

 

Overall tone: frustrated and critical of U.S. foreign policy and leadership competence; worried the U.S. has ceded bargaining strength to China and is making morally questionable decisions abroad.